In order to promote public education and public safety, equal justice for all, a better informed citizenry, the rule of law, world trade and world peace, this legal document is hereby made available on a noncommercial basis, as it is the right of all humans to know and speak the laws that govern them.
IS : 4991 - 1968
(Reaffirmed 2003)
(Fourth Reprint APRIL 2006)
UDC 699.85 : 624.04
© Copyright 1969
BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS
MANAK BHAVAN, 9 BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG
NEW DELHI 110002
Gr 8
September 1969
iIndian Standard
CRITERIA FOR BLAST RESISTANT DESIGN OF STRUCTURES FOR EXPLOSIONS ABOVE GROUND
Earthquake Engineering Sectional Committee, BDC 39
Chairman | Representing |
Dr Jai Krishna | School of Research & Training in Earthquake Engineering, University of Roorkee, Roorkee |
Members | |
Dr A. S. Arya | School of Research & Training in Earthquake Engineering, University of Roorkee, Roorkee |
Shri Kamleswar Barua | Public Works Department, Government of Assam |
Shri B. S. Bhalla | Bhakra & Beas Designs Organization, Nangal |
Shri A. S. Chatrath (Alternate) | |
Dr S. M. K. Chetty | Central Building Research Institute (CSIR), Roorkee |
Shri M. P. Jaisingh (Alternate) | |
Shri J. Datt | The Concrete Association of India, Bombay |
Shri T. M. Menon (Alternate) | |
Deputy Director, Standards | Railway Board, RDSO, Lucknow |
Shri D. S. Desai | M. N. Dastur & Co Ltd, Bombay |
Director (Dams II) | Central Water & Power Commission, New Delhi |
Director (Dams III) (Alternate) | |
Director-IN-Charge | Geological Survey of India, Lucknow |
Shri V. S. Krishnaswamy (Alternate) | |
Shri T. K. Dutta | Regional Research Laboratory (CSIR), Jorhat |
Shri C. P. Ghosh | Engineer-in-Chief’s Branch, Army Headquarters, New Delhi |
SO2 (Designs) (Alternate) | |
Dr S. K. Guha | Central Water & Power Research Station, Poona |
Shri R. N. Joshi | S. B. Joshi & Co Ltd, Bombay |
Shri T. J. Manickam | The Indian Institute of Architects, Bombay |
Prof G. S. Ramaswamy | Structural Engineering Research Centre (CSIR), Roorkee |
Shri P. Srinivasulu (Alternate) | |
Superintending Surveyor of Central public Works Department, New Delhi Works II | |
Surveyor OF Works I (Alternate) |
BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS
MANAK BHAVAN, 9 BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG
NEW DELHI 110002
Members | Representing |
Dr A. N. Tandon | Directorate General of Observatories, Ministry of Transport & Aviation, New Delhi |
Shri R. Nagarajan, | Director General, ISI (Ex-officio Member) |
Director (Civ Engg) |
Secretary
Shri Bimlesh Kumar
Assistant Director (Civ Engg), ISI
Blast Resistant Design of Structures Subcommittee, BDC 39 : 2
Convener | |
---|---|
Dr A. S. Arya | School of Research & Training in Earthquake Engineering, University of Roorkee, Roorkee |
Members | |
Dr A. R. Chandrasekaran | School of Research & Training in Earthquake Engineering, University of Roorkee, Roorkee |
Shri C. P. Ghosh | Engineer-in-Chief’s Branch, Army Headquarters, New Delhi |
Dr Sampooran Singh | Terminal Ballastics Research Laboratory, Chandigarh |
Shri P. K. Misra (Alternate) | |
Shri K. K. Sud | Ministry of Defence, New Delhi |
Indian Standard
CRITERIA FOR BLAST RESISTANT DESIGN OF STRUCTURES FOR EXPLOSIONS ABOVE GROUND
This Indian Standard was adopted by the Indian Standards Institution on 17 November 1968, after the draft finalized by the Earthquake Engineering Sectional Committee had been approved by the Civil Engineering Division Council.
Structures designed to resist blast loads are subjected to completely different type of load than that considered in conventional design. Here they are hit with a rapidly moving shock wave which may exert pressures many times greater than those experienced under the greatest of hurricanes. However, in blast phenomenon, the peak intensity lasts for a very small duration only.
The blast wave loads the exposed surface of the structure and then the load is transmitted to the other elements. Thus, the response of each individual element is important unlike the ground motion wherein the whole structural system is simultaneously causing inertia effects on all parts.
To design a structure capable of resisting these intense but short duration loads, members and joints are permitted to deflect and strain much greater than is allowed for usual static loads. This permitted deflection is, ordinarily, well into the plastic range of the material. Large amounts of energy are absorbed during this action, thus reducing the required design strength considerably below that required by conventional design within elastic range. Moreover, under higher rates of loading the strength developed by the material, increases with the rate of loading, and may often be adequately described as a function of time within a certain range.
Whereas, if the location of the ground zero (see 2.8), and the size of bomb are known, the corresponding blast loading for an existing structure may be found by the methods explained in this standard. However, it will never be possible to have exact data for specifying the expected ground zero and bomb size. Therefore, three different
3standard blast loadings (see 12.2), are recommended in this standard. Nevertheless, this standard also contains necessary information for evaluating various parameters of a blast wave generated by any other size of explosion at a given distance and the design of a structure for the same. It may be mentioned that if a building receives a shock stronger than the one for which it is designed, it is likely to suffer a higher category of damage.
Fires may generally follow an air raid, it is, therefore, important to design structures against fire. Attention to the relevant Indian Standards on fire safety is, therefore, invited.
Flying splinters from a bomb may also cause considerable damage to the portion of the structure exposed to them. Wall thicknesses considered safe against flying splinters from a bomb are given in Appendix C.
In the formulation of this standard, in addition to other publications the following have been consulted:
Biggs (J M). Introduction to structural dynamics, 1964. McGraw Hill Book Company, Inc, New York.
Kinney (G F). Explosive shocks in air, 1962. The Machmillan Company, New York.
Norris (C H), Hansen (R J), Holley Jr (M J), Biggs (J M), Naymet (S), and Minami (J K). Structural design for dynamic loading, 1959. McGraw Hill Book Co, Inc, New York
Design of structures to resist nuclear weapon effects. Manual of Engineering Practic No. 42, 1964. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
United States of America. Department of Army, Army Corps of Engineers. Design of structures to resist the effect of atomic weapons, Manual No. TM-5-856-3, 1957, Government Printing Office, Washington.
For the purpose of deciding whether a particular requirement of this standard is complied with, the final value, observed or calculated, expressing the result of a test or analysis, shall be rounded off in accordance with IS : 2-1960*. The number of significant places retained in the rounded off value should be the same as that of the specified value in this standard.
This standard covers the criteria for design of structures for blast effects of explosions above ground. This standard does not cover the design for blast effects of nuclear explosions.
* Rules for rounding off numerical values (revised).
4For the purpose of this standard, the following definitions, shall apply.
Blast Wind—It is the moving air mass along with the over-pressures resulting from pressure difference behind the shock wave front. The blast wind movement during the positive phase of the overpressures is in the direction of shock front propagation.
Clearance Time—This is the time in which the reflected pressure decays down to the sum of the side on overpressure and the drag pressure.
Decay Parameter—It is the coefficient of the negative power of exponent e governing the fall of pressure with time in the pressure-time curves.
Drag Force—It is the force on a structure or structural element due to the blast wind. On any structural element, the drag force equals dynamic pressure multiplied by the drag coefficient of the element.
Ductility Ratio—It is the ratio of the maximum deflection to the deflection corresponding to the elastic limit.
Dynamic Pressure—It is the pressure effect of air mass movement called the blast wind.
Equivalent Bare Charge—It is the weight of a bare high explosive charge geometrically similar to any given cased charge, which produces the same blast field as the given cased charge.
Ground Zero—It is the point on the earth surface vertically below the explosion.
Impulse—Impulse per unit of projected area is the pressure-time product given by the area under the pressure-time curve considered for the positive phase only unless otherwise specified.
Mach Number—It is the ratio of the speed of the shock front propagation to the speed of sound in standard atmosphere at sea level.
Overpressure—It is the rise in pressure above atmospheric pressure due to the shock wave from an air blast.
Reflected Overpressure—It is the overpressure resulting due to reflection of a shock wave front striking any surface. If the shock front is parallel to the surface, the reflection is normal.
Shock Wave Front—It is the discontinuity between the blast wave, and the surrounding atmosphere. It propagates away from the
5point of explosion in all directions at a speed greater than the speed of sound in the undisturbed atmosphere.
Side-on Overpressure—It is the overpressure if it is not reflected by any surface.
Transit Time—It is the time required for the shock front to travel across the structure or its element under consideration.
Yield—It is a measure of the size of the explosion expressed in equivalent weight of reference explosive.
For the purpose of this standard, the following notations shall apply.
a | Velocity of sound in air |
B | Span or width of structure across the direction of shock wave propagation |
Cd | Drag coefficient |
E | Modulus of elasticity of material |
H | Height of the structure |
I | Moment of inertia of member |
j | Number of concentrated load points |
Ka | Coefficient of earth pressure |
KLM | Load mass factor |
KL | Load factor |
KM | Mass factor |
k | Ratio of resistance required to peak overpressure |
k1 & k2 | Values of k for μ and time ratios and |
kE | Effective stiffness of equivalent single spring-mass system |
L | Length of structure in the direction of motion of blast wave (see Fig. 2, 7 and 9) |
M | Mach number for incident shock front |
Mt | Total actual mass |
Mr | Concentrated mass at point r |
m | Distributed mass intensity per unit length |
n | Number of concentrated masses |
Pt | Total dynamic load (at any instant of time) 6 |
Pr | Concentrated dynamic force at point r |
P(x) | Intensity of distributed dynamic load per unit length |
Pa | Ambient atmospheric pressure |
Pro | Peak reflected overpressure |
Ps | Side-on overpressure |
Pso | Peak side-on overpressure |
q | Dynamic pressure |
qo | Peak dynamic pressure |
Rm | Resistance required by a structural member |
S | ½ B or H whichever is less |
T | Effective time period of structural member |
ti | Clearance time |
t1 | Duration of the equivalent triangular pulse |
t[Illegible Text Omitted on Page 7] | Time for positive phase of side-on overpressure |
t1 | Duration of the equivalent triangular pulse for drag loading only |
tt | Transit time |
V | Shock front velocity |
V | Yield of explosion |
Ye | Deflection/deformation at yield point of idealised resistance deflection curve |
Ym | Maximum deflection/deformation permitted in the design of the structure |
Z | Tension steel ratio |
Z′ | Compression steel ratio |
α | Decay parameter |
ϕr | Deflection at point r of an assumed deflected shape for concentrated loads |
ϕ(∞) | Deflection at point x of an assumed deflected shape for distributed loads |
μ |
The Source—The conventional chemical charge is considered spherical. The shock front at the ground surface from a contact burst
7is approximately vertical. The effective yield of a contact burst is almost double of an equal explosion high in the air. This condition is assumed to give most serious effects.
Shock Wave—As a result of explosion, a shock wave is generated in the air which moves outward in all directions from the point of burst with high speed causing time-dependent pressure and suction effects at all points in its way. The shock wave consists of an initial positive pressure phase followed by a negative (suction) phase at any point as shown in Fig. 1. The shock wave is accompanied by blast wind causing dynamic pressures due to drag effects on any obstruction coming in its way. Due to diffraction of the wave at an obstructing surface reflected pressure is caused instantaneously which clears in a time depending on the extent of obstructing surface.
Fig. 1 Shock Wave Produced by Blast
Pressures and Duration—At any surface encountered by the slock wave, the pressure rises almost instantaneously to the peak value of side-on overpressure and the dynamic pressure or their reflected pressure. The peak values depend upon the size of explosion, the distance of the surface from the source, and other factors like ambient pressure and temperature in air.
The incident blast wave characteristics are described by the peak initial overpressure pso, the overpressure ps versus time t curve; the maximum dynamic pressure q0, the dynamic pressure q versus time t curve and the duration of positive phase t0.
The peak positive intensity quickly drops down to zero; the total duration of the positive phase being a few milliseconds. The maximum negative overpressure is much smaller than the peak positive overpressure, its limiting value being one atmosphere. But the negative phase duration is 2 to 5 times as long as that of the positive phase.
8General Principles—As in the case of normal loads, members subjected to blast pressures resist the applied force by means of internal stresses developed in them. However, the effective load due to blast, for which resistance should be developed in the member, depends upon, the dynamic properties of the member itself. Longer the natural time period of the member smaller is the effective load for design.
The duration of positive phase of blast is generally small as compared with the natural period of the structural elements, hence may be treated as an impulse problem.
Considering the probability of occurrence of blast loading to be small, structures may be permitted to deform in the plastic range for economical design. Permitting plastic deformations increases the energy absorption and has the further advantage that the effective time period of the structural element is elongated, thereby reducing the effective load for its design.
Most severe blast loading on any face of a structure is produced when the structure is oriented with the face normal to the direction of propagation of the shock front. However, for lack of known orientation of future explosion, every face of the structure shall be considered as a front face. When the blast field surrounds the structure, the difference of pressures on front and rear faces tends to tilt and overturn the structure as a whole.
Maximum Values for Reference Explosion—The maximum values of the positive side-on overpressure pso, reflected overpressure pro and dynamic pressure qo, as caused by the explosion of one tonne explosive at various distances from the point of explosion, are given in Table 1. The duration of the positive phase of the blast t0 and the equivalent time duration of positive phase td are also given in Table 1.
Decay of Pressure with Time—The pressure varies with time according to the following relations:
9Note 1—As will be noted from the above equations the dynamic pressure q decays much faster with time than the side-on overpressure ps.
Note 2—Since the use of these relations in design problem would involve tedious calculations, the pressure time relations in the positive phase are idealised by using a straight line starting with the maximum pressure value but terminating at a time td or tq such that the impulse value remains the same. This criteria has been adopted in this standard.
Distance, m x | Peak Side on Overpressure Ratio pso/pa | Mach No. M | Positive Phase Duration to, milli-secs | Duration of Equivalent Triangular Pulse td, milli-secs | Dynamic Pressure Ratio qo/pd | Peak Reflected Overpressure Ratio pro/pa |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
15 | 8.00 | 2.80 | 9.50 | 5.39 | 10.667 | 41.60 |
18 | 5.00 | 2.30 | 11.00 | 7.18 | 5.208 | 22.50 |
21 | 3.30 | 1.96 | 16.38 | 9.33 | 2.643 | 12.94 |
24 | 2.40 | 1.75 | 18.65 | 11.22 | 1.532 | 8.48 |
27 | 1.80 | 1.60 | 20.92 | 13.30 | 0.920 | 5.81 |
30 | 1.40 | 1.48 | 22.93 | 15.39 | 0.583 | 4.20 |
33 | 1.20 | 1.42 | 24.95 | 16.31 | 0.439 | 3.45 |
36 | 1.00 | 1.36 | 26.71 | 17.94 | 0.312 | 2.75 |
39 | 0.86 | 1.32 | 28.22 | 19.20 | 0.235 | 2.28 |
42 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 29.74 | 20.20 | 0.186 | 1.97 |
45 | 0.66 | 1.25 | 31.25 | 21.60 | 0.142 | 1.66 |
48 | 0.59 | 1.23 | 32.26 | 22.70 | 0.115 | 1.46 |
51 | 0.53 | 1.20 | 33.52 | 23.70 | 0.093 | 1.28 |
54 | 0.48 | 1.19 | 34.52 | 24.70 | 0.077 | 1.14 |
57 | 0.43 | 1.17 | 35.53 | 26.40 | 0.062 | 1.01 |
60 | 0.40 | 1.16 | 36.29 | 26.60 | 0.054 | 0.93 |
63 | 0.37 | 1.15 | 37.30 | 27.80 | 0.046 | 0.55 |
66 | 0.34 | 1.14 | 38.05 | 28.76 | 0.039 | 0.77 |
69 | 0.32 | 1.13 | 38.81 | 29.25 | 0.035 | 0.72 |
72 | 0.30 | 1.12 | 39.56 | 29.87 | O.031 | 0.67 |
75 | 0.28 | 1.11 | 40.32 | 30.71 | 0.027 | 0.62 |
78 | 0.26 | 1.104 | 40.82 | 3.85 | 0.023 | 0.58 |
81 | 0.25 | 1.100 | 41.58 | 31.92 | 0.022 | 0.55 |
84 | 0.24 | 1.098 | 42.34 | 32.00 | 0.020 | 0.53 |
87 | 0.23 | 1.095 | 42.84 | 32.26 | 0.018 | 0.50 |
90 | 0.22 | 1.086 | 43.60 | 33.39 | 0.016 | 0.47 |
93 | 0.20 | 1.082 | 44.35 | 34.70 | 0.014 | 0.43 |
96 | 0.19 | 1.077 | 45.46 | 35.37 | 0.013 | 0.41 |
99 | 0.18 | 1.072 | 45.61 | 36.22 | 0.012 | 0.40 |
Note 1—The value of pa the ambient air pressure may be taken as 1 kg/cm2 at mean sea level. |
Scaling Laws—For any explosion other than the reference explosion, the peak pressures and time durations may be found from the peak values given in Table 1 by the cube root scaling laws as given below:
Where
W | = | yield of explosion in equivalent weight of the reference explosive measured in tonnes, |
x | = | scaled distance for entering the Table 1 for reading peak values, and |
to | = | scaled time read from Table 1 against scaled distance. |
NOTE—Actual distance is measured from the ground zero to the point under consideration. Actual time is the time for actual explosion.
Types of Structures—There are mainly the following two types of structures:
Closed Rectangular Structures—(See Fig. 2).
Front Face—As the shock wave strikes the vertical face of a structure normal reflection occurs and the pressure on the front face instantaneously increases to the reflected overpressure pro given by the following equation:
where
pa | = | the ambient atmospheric pressure. Taking pa = l kg/cm2, the value of pro are given in Table 1. |
Fig. 2 Above Ground Rectangular Structure
The net pressure acting on the front face at any time t [Illegible Text Omitted on Page 12] the reflected overpressure pr or (ps + Cd q), whichever is greater: where
Cd | = | drag coefficient given in Table 2, and |
Pr | = | the reflected overpressure which drops from the peak value pro to overpressure (ps + Cd q), in clearance time tc given by: |
Where
S | = | H or B/2 whichever is less (see Fig. 2) |
U | = | shock front velocity = M.a |
Where
a | = | velocity of sound in air which may be taken as 344 m/s at mean sea level at 20°C, and |
M | = | Mach number of the incident pulse given by . The values of M for various conditions are also tabulated in Table 1. |
The net average loading on the front face (B × H) as a function of time is shown in Fig. 3A or 3B depending on whether tc is smaller than or equal to td. The pressures pro, pso and qo and time td are for actual explosion determined according to the scaling laws given in 5.3.
Rear Face—Using the pressures for the actual explosion, the average loading on the rear face (B × H in Fig. 2) is taken as shown in Fig. 4 where the time has been reckoned from the instant the shock
12first strikes the front face. The time intervals of interest are the following:
Sl No. | Shape of Element | Drag Coefficient Cd | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
For Closed Rectangular Structures | |||
i) | Front vertical face | 1.0 | |
ii) | Roof, rear and side faces for | For above ground structures | |
q0 = 0 to 1.8 kg/cm2 | —0.4 | ||
q0 = 1.8 to 3.5 kg/cm2 | —0.3 | ||
q0 = 3.5 to 9.0 kg/cm2 | —0.2 | ||
iii) | Front face sloping | ||
4 to 1 | zero | For semi-buried structures | |
1½ to 1 | 0.4 | ||
For Open, drag Type Structures | |||
iv) | Sphere | 0.1 | — |
v) | Cylinder | 1.2 | This covers steel tubes used as columns, truss members, etc |
vi) | Structural shapes | 2.0 | This covers flats, angles, tees, I sections, etc |
vii) | Rectangular projection | 1.3 | This covers beam projections below or above slabs, cantilever walls standing freely-above ground, etc |
Roof and Side Walls—As for rear face in 6.2.2, the average pressure versus time curve for roof and side walls is given in Fig. 5 A, when td is greater than the transit time . When tt is greater than td the load on roof and side walls may be considered as a moving triangular pulse having the peak value of overpressure (pso+ Cd · qo) and time td as shown in Fig. 5B.
13Fig. 3 Pressure Versus Time for Front Face
Fig. 4 Pressure Versus Time for Rear Face
Overturning of Structure—The net average load as a function of time which tends to cause sliding and overturning of the building is obtained by subtracting the loading on back face from that on the front face.
An example of calculation on pressure-time curves on a rectangular above-ground building is given in Appendix A.
Open or drag Type Structures—The net translational pressure on the obstructing areas of elements may be taken’ as shown in
14Fig. 5 Pressure Versus Time for Roof and Side Walls
15Fig. 6 where Cd is the drag coefficient depending upon the shape of the structural element given in Table 2 and tq is given as follows:
tq = ½ to … … … … … (5)
Note – The pressures Pso and, time to are for actual explosion.
Fig. 6 Pressure Versus Time for Open Structures
Partly Open Structures—When the area of openings is more than 50 percent of the area of walls, the structure may be considered drag type (see 6.3.1). When the area of openings is less than 5 percent of the area of walls, the structure may be considered closed type, (see 6.2). For intermediate conditions, direct interpolation may be made between the two conditions of both maximum pressures and time duration.
Gable Ends—The loading may be taken same as for front and rear faces of above ground rectangular structure.
Curved Surface—The direction of shock wave propagation is taken transverse to the ridge of the structure and since the usual arch spans are, large so that the transit time tt is greater than the positive phase time td, average loading condition can not be assumed. Therefore, the loading on curved surface may be taken as a moving triangular pulse as shown in Fig 5B.
Closed Dome Structures—The loading on a domical structure may be taken as a moving triangular pressure pulse as shown in Fig. 5B. The variation of pressure transverse to the direction of propagation of the pulse may be considered symmetrical varying according to Cos θ where the angle θ is measured from longitudinal vertical section of the dome (see Fig. 5C).
16Types of Structures—The below-ground structures are classified into buried and semi-buried structures depending upon the earth cover and slopes of earth berms. The buried structure is subjected only to the general overpressure pso, the reflected and dynamic pressures being neglected. The semi-buried structure is subjected to partial dynamic pressures besides the general overpressure. Both are acted upon by air-induced ground shock also.
A rectangular structure is considered buried if it satisfies the condition shown in Fig. 7.
The pressure versus time diagrams for the various faces of the structure are shown in Fig. 8. The values of the coefficient of earth pressure Ka appearing in Fig. 8 are given in Table 3.
Fig. 7 Buried Rectangular Structure
An arch or dome structure is considered buried if it satisfies the condition shown in Fig. 9.
The pressure versus time relations at crown and wall are the same as that on the roof and walls of a buried rectangular structure respectively. The pressure on the slope of the arch or dome may gradually be reduced from crown towards the springings such that the pressure at springing becomes equal to that on the wall. If the semi-central angle is less than 45°, the arch or dome may be designed for the same pressure as the roof of a buried rectangular structure.
17Fig. 8 Pressure Versus Time Diagrams for Various Faces of Buried Structure
18Sl No. | Type of Soil | Coefficient Ka |
---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) |
i) | Cohesionless soil, dry or damp | ¼ |
ii) | Cohesive soil: | |
a) Stiff unsaturated | ⅓ | |
b) Medium unsaturated | ½ | |
c) Soft unsaturated | ¾ | |
iii) | Fully saturated soil | 1 |
Fig. 9 Buried Arch or Dome Structure
Semi-buried structures are those which do not have the minimum earth cover or the slopes are steeper than those specified in Fig. 7 and 9. These are subjected to dynamic pressures besides the general overpressures.
A minimum slope of 1½ to 1 may be used for the earth cover. The reflected pressure effect may be neglected and dynamic pressure may be considered on the front face with drag coefficient 0.4. For flatter slope the drag coefficient may be reduced making it zero when the slope becomes 4 to 1.
19The loading on the earth berm surface may be computed as for the above ground structures.
The significant factors, on which the response of a structural element subject to blast forces depends, are the pressure versus time diagram acting on the element, the effective time period of the element, the resistance versus deflection diagram of the element, and the maximum permissible deflection.
When the ratio of time duration td or to to the natural period of the element is less than 0.1, the problem may be considered as an impulse problem taking the area under the pressure versus time curve as impulse per unit area. In such a case, the shape of pressure-time curve is not important.
In most cases, the pressure-time diagram can be idealised without loss of accuracy as a triangular pulse (Fig. 10 A) having the same maximum pressure as in the original diagram and the time so adjusted that the area under the curve remains unchanged. However, where the load acting on the front face has the shape of the diagram of Fig. 10 B, it may be treated as such (see also 8.2.4).
Fig. 10 Idealized Pressure Time Diagrams
For simplicity the resistance versus deflection diagram of an element is idealized as elasto-plastic as shown in Fig. 11 by keeping the area under the actual and idealized curves about the same up to the maximum permissible deflection.
20Fig. 11 Idealized Resistance Deflection Diagram
The maximum permissible deflection defines the energy absorption capacity of the element which is equal to the area under the resistance versus deflection curve. For a given blast, greater the permissible deflection, lesser will be the maximum resistance required in the member.
Based on the triangular pressure-time curve shown in Fig. 10 A and elasto-plastic resistance-deflection curve shown in Fig. 11, the ratio of resistance Rm required to the peak overpressure po is given in Fig. 12 for various values of ta/T and μ.
Figure 12 also shows the time tm at which maximum deflection occurs, as a ratio of time T for various values of td/T and μ.
When the time ratio td/T is less than 0.1, the ratio k may be computed from the following equation:
When the pressure-time diagram, is given by Fig. 10 B, the following equation shall be satisfied:
where
Rm | = | the required resistance, and |
k1, k2 | = | the values of ratios k for ductility ratio μ and time ratios td1/T and td2/T respectively. |
Fig. 12 Response Chart for Triangular Pressure Pulse
22Elastic Rebound—After attaining the maximum response, the structure is found to oscillate and may have an elastic rebound equal and opposite to the maximum deflection. Therefore, members shall be designed to have the same strength for the reversal of the effective design load.
The structural element or frame-work may be replaced by an equivalent single spring-mass system having effective stiffness kE and effective mass equal to KLM · Mt, where Mt is the actual mass of the member under consideration and KLM is a load-mass factor depending upon the stiffness and mass distribution in the member and its boundary conditions. The equivalent system is defined so that the deflection of the equivalent single mass is the same as that of some significant point in the given structure. The effective stiffness kE is defined with respect to the deflection of this point.
The load-mass factor KLM is equal to the ratio of mass factor KM to the load factor KL. The factors are evaluated on the basis of an assumed deflected shape of the structure as given below:
where
Mt | = | total actual mass, |
n | = | number of concentrated masses, |
Mr | = | concentrated mass at point r, |
ϕr | = | deflection at point r of an assumed deflected shape for concentrated loads, |
m | = | distributed mass intensity per unit length, |
ϕ(x) | = | deflection at point x of an assumed deflected shape for distributed loads, |
Pt | = | total dynamic load (at any instant of time), |
j | = | number of concentrated load points, 23 |
Pr | = | concentrated dynamic force at point r, and |
P(∞) | = | intensity of distributed dynamic load per unit length. |
Note 1—Values of the factors kE and KLM for certain structural members are given in Tables 4 to 6.
Note 2—The deflected shape is suitably chosen to resemble as far as possible the true deflected shape taking into consideration, whether the structure or member remains elastic or goes into the plastic range. It may be taken the same as due to static application of the dynamic load on the structure. The deflected shape has to be normalized such that ϕ = 1 at the point with respect to which the effective stiffness kE is defined.
Two typical examples explaining the evaluation of KLM are given in Appendix B.
The time-period T of the structural member may be calculated from the equation:
For elastic analysis (ductility ratio μ ≤ 1.0) of structures, the effective stiffness kE and load mass factor kLM are to be used as given in Tables 4 to 6. For elasto-plastic analysis kE is to be used as given in Tables 4 to 6 but value of KLM. may be chosen in between the elastic and plastic cases depending upon the ductility factor.
For elasto-plastic design of fixed slabs, the modified value of kE is to be worked out in accordance with Fig. 11B using, the stiffness values of slab in elastic and elasto-plastic cases as given in Table 6 and kLM is to be suitably chosen depending upon the ductility factor.
For calculating moment of inertia I of reinforced concrete sections, the effective transformed area may be used. The value of modular ratio shall be taken the same as in static design for calculating EI.
General—Plastic deformation of the structural elements should be permitted except where the functioning of the structure would be adversely affected by their permanent displacements.
Under rapid rates of straining as associated with blast loading, materials develop higher strengths than in statically loaded members. Under such conditions the dynamic strength may be taken greater than the minimum specified static strength as indicated in 10.2 to 10.5.
24L = span, p = dynamic pressure, Pt = dynamic load, Mp = plastic moment of section | |||||||
Mpm = MP at mid-span, Mps = Mp at support, RM = maximum resistance | |||||||
kE = effective spring constant | |||||||
Resistance curve, End conditions of Beams ob One-Way Slabs | Dynamic Loading | Strain Range | Load-Mass Factor | Maximum Resistance Rm | Effective Spring Constant kE | Dynamic Reaction | |
Concentrated Mass | Uniform Mass | ||||||
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) |
Uniform Pt = pL |
Elastic Plastic |
— — |
0-78 1-66 |
8Mp/L 8Mp/L |
384 EI/5L3— | 0.39 Rm + 0.11 Pt 0.38 Rm + 0.12 pt |
|
Concentrated at mid-span Pt = P | Elastic Plastic |
1.0 1.0 |
0.49 0.33 |
4 Mp/L 4 Mp/L |
48 EI/L3 | 0.78 Rm − 0.28 Pt 0.75 Rm − 0.25 pt |
|
Concentrated at third points P\2 each Pt = P | Elastic Plastic |
0.87 1.0 |
0.60 0.56 |
6 Mp/L 6 Mp/L |
56.4 EI/L3— | 0.62 Rm − 0.12 Pt 0.52 Rm − 0.02 pt |
|
uniform pt = pL | Elastic (OA) Elastic (OB) plastic |
— — — |
0.77 0.78 0.66 |
12Mps/L (8/L)(Mps + Mpm (8/L)(Mps + Mpm |
384 EI/L3 307 EI/L3 |
0.36 Rl + 0.41 pt 0.39 Rm + 0.11 pt 0.38 Rm + 0.12 pt |
|
Concentrated at mid-span Pt = P | Elastic (OB) Plastic |
1.0 1.0 |
0.37 0.33 |
(4/L)(Mps + Mpm (4/L)(Mps + Mpm |
192 EI/L3— | 0.71 Rm − 0.21 Pt 0.75 Rm − 0.25 Pt |
|
Fixed at one end and simply sup ported at the other | Uniform Pt − pL |
Elastic (OA) Elastic (OB’) Plastic |
— — — |
0.78 0.78 0.66 |
(8/L) Mps (4/L) (Mps + 2Mpm (4/L) (Mps + 2Mpm) |
185 EI/L3 160 EI/L3 — |
(V1 = 0.26 R1 + 0.12 Pt) (V2 = 0.43 R1 + 0.19 Pt) 0.39 Rm + 0.11 Pt ± Mps/L 0.38 Rm + 0.12 Pt ± Mps/L |
Concentrated at mid-span Pt = P | Elastic (OA) Elastic (OB’) Plastic |
1.0 1.0 1.0 |
0.45 0.49 0.33 |
(16/3L) MPs (2/L)(Mpm + 2Mps (2/L)(Mps + 2Mpm |
107 EI/L3 106 EI/L3 — |
(V1 = 0.54 R1 + 0.14 Pt) (V2 = 0.25 R1 + 0.07 Pt) 0.78 Rm − 0.28 Pt ± Mps/L 0.75 Rm − 0.25 Pt ± Mps/L |
|
*Taken from ‘Design of structures to resist the effect of atomic weapons’, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Manual TM5-856.3, 1957. |
Mpfa = Total positive ultimate moment capacity along mid span section parallel to short edge | ||||||
Mpfb = Total positive ultimate moment capacity along mid span section parallel to long edge | ||||||
I = Moment of inertia per unit width of slab, Pt = Dynamic load | ||||||
VA = Total dynamic reaction along a short edge | ||||||
VB = Total dynamic reaction along a long edge | ||||||
Strain Range | a/b | Load Mass factor KLM | Maximum Resistance Rm | Spring constant kE | Dynamic Reactions | |
VA | VB | |||||
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
Elastic(OB) | ||||||
1.0 | 0.68 | 12 (Mpfa + Mpfb)/ a | 252 EI/a2 | 0.07 Pt + 0.18 Rm | 0.07 Pt + 0.18 Rm | |
0.9 | 0.70 | 12 (Mpfa + 11 Mpfb)/ a | 230 EI/a3 | 0.06 Pt + 0.16 Rm | 0.08 Pt + 0.20 Rm | |
0.8 | 0.71 | 12 (Mpfa + 10.3 Mpfb)/ a | 212 EI/a2 | 0.06 Pt + 0.14 Rm | 0.08 Pt + 0.22 Rm | |
0.7 | 0.73 | 12 (Mpfa + 9.8 Mpfb)/a | 201 EI/a2 | 0.05 Pt + 0.13 Rm | 0.08 Pt + 0.24 Rm | |
0.6 | 0.74 | 12 (Mpfa + 9.3 Mpfb)/a | 197 EI/a2 | 0.04 Pt + 0.11 Rm | 0.09 Pt + 0.26 Rm | |
0.5 | 0.75 | 12 (Mpfa + 9.0 Mpfb)/a | 201 EI/a2 | 0.04 Pt + 0.09 Rm | 0.09 Pt + 0.28 Rm | |
Plastic (BC) | ||||||
1.0 | 0.51 | 12 (Mpfa + Mpfb)/a | — | 0.09 Pt + 0.16 Rm | 0.09 Pt + 0.16 Rm | |
0.9 | 0.51 | (12 Mpfa + 11 Mpfb)/ a | — | 0.08 Pt + 0.15 Rm | 0.09 Pt + 0.18 Rm | |
0.8 | 0.54 | (12 Mpfa + 10.3 Mpfb)/a | — | 0.07 Pt + 0.13 Rm | 0.10 Pt + 0.20 Rm | |
0.7 | 0.58 | (12 Mpfa + 9.8 Mpfb)/a | — | 0.06 Pt + 0.12 Rm | 0.10 Pt + 0.22 Rm | |
0.6 | 0.58 | (12 Mpfa + 9.3 Mpfb)/a | — | 0.05 Pt + 0.10 Rm | 0.10 Pt + 0.25 Rm | |
0.5 | 0.59 | (12 Mpfa + 9.0 Mpfb)/a | — | 0.04 Pt + 0.08 Rm | 0.11 Pt + 0.27 Rm | |
*Taken from ‘Design of structures to resist the effects of atomic weapons’, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Manual TM 5-856-3, 1957. |
M°psb = Negative ultimate moment capacity per unit width at centre of long edge | ||||||
Mpsa = Total negative ultimate moment capacity along a short edge support | ||||||
Mpsb = Total negative ultimate moment capacity along a long edge support | ||||||
Mpfa, Mpfb, I, Pt (see Table 5) | ||||||
VA = Total dynamic reaction along a short edge | ||||||
VB = Total dynamic reaction along a long edge | ||||||
Strain Range | a/b | Load Mass Factor KLM | Maximum Resistance Rm | Spring Constant kE | Dynamic Reactions | |
VA | VB | |||||
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
Elastic (OA) | ||||||
1.0 | 0.63 | 29.2 M°psb | 810 EI/2 | 0.10 Pt + 0.15 RI | 0.10 Pt + 0.17 RI | |
0.9 | 0.68 | 27.4 M°psb | 742 EI/2 | 0.09 Pt + 0.14 RI | 0.10 Pt + 0.17 RI | |
0.8 | 0.69 | 26.4 M°psb | 705 EI/2 | 0.08 Pt + 0.12 RI | 0.11 Pt + 0.19 RI | |
0.7 | 0.71 | 26.2 M°psb | 692 EI/2 | 0.07 Pt + 0.11 RI | 0.11 Pt + 0.21 RI | |
0.6 | 0.71 | 27.3 M°psb | 724 EI/2 | 0.06 Pt + 0.09 RI | 0.12 Pt + 0.23 RI | |
0.5 | 0.72 | 30.2 M°psb | 806 EI/2 | 0.05 Pt + 0.08 RI | 0.12 Pt + 0.25 RI | |
Elasto-Flastic (OB’) | ||||||
1.0 | 0.67 | (1/a) [12(Mpfa + Mpsa) + 12(Mpfb + MPsb)] | 252 EI/a2 | 0.07 Pt + 0.18 Rm | 0.07 Pt + 0.18 Rm | |
0.9 | 0.70 | (1/a) [12(Mpfa + Mpsa) + 11(Mpfb + MPsb)] | 230 EI/a2 | 0.06 Pt + 0.16 Rm | 0.08 Pt + 0.20 Rm | |
0.8 | 0.71 | (1/a) [12(Mpfa + Mpsa) + 10.3(Mpfb + MPsb)] | 212 EI/a2 | 0.06 Pt + 0.14 Rm | 0.08 Pt + 0.22 Rm | |
0.7 | 0.73 | (1/a) [12(Mpfa + Mpsa) + 9.8(Mpfb + MPsb)] | 201 EI/a2 | 0.05 Pt + 0.13 Rm | 0.08 Pt + 0.24 Rm | |
0.6 | 0.74 | (1/a) [12(Mpfa + Mpsa) + 9.3(Mpfb + MPsb)] | 197 EI/a2 | 0.04 Pt + 0.11 Rm | 0.09 Pt + 0.26 Rm | |
0.5 | 0.75 | (1/a) [12(Mpfa + Mpsa) + 9.0(Mpfb + MPsb)] | 201 EI/a2 | 0.04 Pt + 0.09 Rm | 0.09 Pt + 0.28 Rm | |
Fully Plastic (BC) | ||||||
1.0 | 0.51 | (1/a) [12(Mpfa + Mpsa) + 12(Mpfb + MPsb)] | — | 0.09 Pt + 0.16 Rm | 0.09 Pt + 0.16 Rm | |
0.9 | 0.51 | (1/a) [12(Mpfa + Mpsa) + 11(Mpfb + MPsb)] | — | 0.08 Pt + 0.15 Rm | 0.09 Pt + 0.18 Rm | |
0.8 | 0.54 | (1/a) [12(Mpfa + Mpsa) + 10.3(Mpfb + MPsb)] | — | 0.07 Pt + 0.13 Rm | 0.10 Pt + 0.20 Rm | |
0.7 | 0.58 | (1/a) [12(Mpfa + Mpsa) + 9.8(Mpfb + MPsb)] | — | 0.06 Pt + 0.12 Rm | 0.10 Pt + 0.22 Rm | |
0.6 | 0.58 | (1/a) [12(Mpfa + Mpsa) + 9.3(Mpfb + MPsb)] | — | 0.05 Pt + 0.10 Rm | 0.10 Pt + 0.25 Rm | |
0.5 | 0.59 | (1/a) [12(Mpfa + Mpsa) + 9.0(Mpfb + MPsb)] | — | 0.08 Pt + 0.08 Rm | 0.11 Pt + 0.27 Rm | |
Range (OA) : Moment at centre of long edge just becomes plastic | ||||||
Range (OB’) : Moment at supports and mid-span sections just become plastic | ||||||
*Taken from ‘Design of structures to resist the effects of atomic weapons’, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Manual tm 5-856-3, 1957. |
The average dynamic yield stress of structural carbon, mild, weldable or rivet steels may be assumed to exceed the minimum specified static yield stress by 25 percent and that of high strength alloy steels by 10 percent.
For elastic design, the resistance Rm of various elements of a framework may be assumed to have just been reached. The dynamic yield stress of steel as given in 10.2.1 shall be used for calculating Rm.
For elasto-plastic design, the ductility ratio may be assumed as follows:
Type of Member | Ductility Ratio, |
---|---|
Members of roof trusses | μ |
Slenderness ratio (1/r) = 180 | 1.0 |
Slenderness ratio (1/r) ≤ 60 | 5.0 |
Members subjected to bending and direct stresses | |
Minor damage | 5.0 |
Moderate damage | 10.0 |
Considerable damage | 20.0 |
Note—For intermediate values of l/r, linear interpolation may be done.
The dynamic strength of material may be assumed as follows:
For dynamic shear in reinforced concrete members, no increase over the static shear strength shall be permitted. For dynamic bond stress in reinforced concrete members, an increase of 25 percent may be permitted over the static strength.
In elastic design, for calculating resistance Rm the ultimate flexural strength on the basis of ultimate load theory shall be assumed to have just been reached. For ultimate strength calculations a reference may be made to IS : 456-1964*, and the dynamic strength of materials as given in 10.3.1 should be used.
*Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete (second revision).
31For elasto-plastic design of reinforced concrete members the ductility ratio may be assumed as follows, provided that the steel ratio remains less than balanced steel ratio for plastic design:
Members Subjected to Bending and Direct Stresses | Ductility Ratio, μ |
---|---|
Minor damage | |
Moderate damage | |
Considerable damage |
Where
z′ | = compression steel ratio, and |
Z | = tension steel ratio. |
The dynamic flexural strength of plain brick and stone masonry may be assumed to be the same as the corresponding static strength. The compressive strength shall be taken 25 precent higher than the corresponding static strength.
For unreinforced brick work the ductility ratio may be limited to 1-5.
For reinforced brickwork, with not less than 0.5 percent steel on each face and not more than balanced percentage, the ductility factors as for reinforced concrete may be used.
The following allowable bearing pressures may be used for-design under blast loading:
Rock | Static crushing strength |
Granular soil | Static load per unit area for 4.0 cm settlement of the structure |
Cohesive soil | ¾ of static failure load per unit area determined by quick undrained test. |
In the absence of test data on soils as envisaged under 10.5.1, the design bearing pressure may be taken equal to twice the allowable static bearing pressure.
Note—In working out the pressure under foundation, the direct loading of ground due to blast overpressures, may be neglected.
For raft foundation, the raft area need not be more than the roof area.
Wind or earthquake forces shall not be assumed to occur simultaneously with blast effects. Effects of temperature and Shrinkage shall be neglected.
Live load on floors shall be considered as per IS : 875-1964* depending upon the class of building. No live load shall be considered on roof at the time of blast.
The design parameters that is the yield of explosion and its distance from the structure will depend upon the importance of the structure and conditions prevailing in a particular time and should be considered by the designer in each specific case.
For general guidance the buildings may be designed for a bare charge of 100 kg at distances given in Table 7.
Building Category | Type | Distance, m |
---|---|---|
A | Residential buildings | 40 |
B | Community buildings, such as schools, offices, cinemas, etc, and industrial buildings with continuous human occupancy | 30 |
C | Buildings provided for accommodating essential service which would be of post bombing importance, such as hospitals, emergency relief stores, power stations, water works, communication centres, etc. | 20 |
General recommendations for planning blast resistant buildings are given in Appendix C.
*Code of practice for structural safety of building: Loading standards (revised).
33(Clause 6.2.5)
Blast parameters due to the detonation of a 0.1 tonne explosive are evaluated on an above ground rectangular structure, 3 m high, 10 m wide and 8 m long, situated at 30 m from ground zero.
From Table 1 assuming pa=1.00 kg/cm2 and linearly interpolating between 63 m and 66 m for the scaled distance 64.65 m, the pressures are directly obtained:
pso = 0.35 kg/cm2
pro = 0.81 kg/cm2
q0 = 0.042 kg/cm2
The scaled times t0 and td obtained from Table 1 for scaled distance 64.65 m are multiplied by (0.1)⅓ to get the values of the respective quantities for the actual explosion of O.1 tonne charge.
to = 37.71 (0.1)⅓ | = 17.5 milliseconds | |
td = 28.32 (0.1)⅓ | = 13.15 milliseconds | |
= 1.14 | ||
a = 344 m/s | U = 392 m/s | = 0.392 m/millisecond |
Here H = 3 m, B = 10 m, and L = 8 m
Then S = 3 m
34As tr > td no pressure on the back face are considered. For roof and sides Cd =—0.4
pso + Cd q0 = 0.35 − 0.4 × 0.042 = 0.33 kg/cm2
The pressure diagrams are as shown below:
(Clause 9.2.1)
The deflected shape of the column in elastic range when p is considered to be acting statically is given by:
where the deflection at the free end has been taken as unity.
35If mass is considered to be uniformly distributed along the height of the column:
Effective stiffness of the cantilever will be defined with respect to the deflection at the free end where ϕ(x) = 1
Period of the cantilever is thus obtained as:
A single storey rigid frame with distributed masses on the roof and sides is subjected to a concentrated dynamic force F(t) at the roof level plus a distributed dynamic load p(t) on one wall surface. Considering only horizontal motion, the equivalent one degree system is defined such that its displacement is equal to the displacement at the roof. If the Walls are assumed to remain straight then the displacement Y∞ of a point at a distance x from the base is given by:
The mass factor KM given by the following equation:
36where m1 and m2 are the masses per unit length (along the frame) of the roof and walls respectively.
The equivalent load is:
and the load factor is:
The effective stiffness kE will be given by the total load [F(t) and p(t) h] causing unit displacement at the top of the frame. If F(t), and p(t) have different time variation, numerical analysis is necessary.
(Clause 12.3)
Small size of rooms generally confine the blast damage to a limited area of the structure, because of the screening action of the partition walls.
Long narrow corridors should be avoided as they tend to increase the extent of damage along the length of the corridors because of ‘multiple reflections’.
All slender projections like, parapets and balconies specially those made of brittle materials should be avoided as far as possible.
Masonry chimneys on factory buildings and boiler houses are a potential hazard and should be avoided.
37Brittle roofing materials, such as tiles arid corrugated asbestos sheets are especially prone to blast damage. When corrugated galvanized iron sheets are used for roofing and/or cladding, particular attention should be paid to the fixtures fastening the corrugated galvanized iron sheets to the framework.
These are especially prone to catch fire in a strafing or incendiary attack and should be best avoided in strategic structures where such attacks might be expected.
Conduit wiring is preferable to open wiring, as in case of large movement of the Walls the conduit will give an added protection to the wiring inside and prevent them from getting cut thus preventing fire hazards due to short circuits.
The most widespread damage due to blast is the breaking of glass panes. The splinters from shattered glass window are dangerous to personnel safety. It is preferable to use non-splintering type glass panes wherever their use cannot be avoided.
Doors should be designed or the front face load.
For protection against splinters from bombs with equivalent bare charges exploding at a distance of 15 m, the wall thicknesses given in Table 8 will be adequate.
Material of Wall | Wall Thickness, cm | |
---|---|---|
For Bomb with Equivalent Bare Charge of 50 kg | For Bomb with Equivalent Bare Charge of 100 kg | |
(1) | (2) | (3) |
Reinforced concrete | 30 | 38 |
Plain concrete or brickwork | 34 | 45 |